'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

by Yuri-hime Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:18 pm

In this thread you can ask any question you have be it silly, interesting, unusual, cracky, and see what kind of answers you will inspire~ =D

I'll start~

This question I've had the discussion with various people over the years, and have yet to find a truly conclusive, satisfying answer to...

Which came first...the Chicken or the Egg?

Seriously! When you think about it, just which one did come first?! The Chicken has to be born from the Egg, but the Egg has to be laid by the Chicken, so...what is the answer? o?o

Anyone have any theories/answers/random thoughts on this! =D

by **Valkyria Lightning** Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:24 pm

God placed the chicken on earth so it would pop out eggs :3 Gay Rainbow

[/sarcasm]
in my opinion, there must be a chicken AND a rooster first o.o how else should a baby-chicken pop out of the egg? o.o

(sorry, it'S late here @___@ thinking is a bitch atm ~~)

by **GoldenSun13** Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:39 pm

I'll just drop this here to lower the tone Razz

'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~! Chicke10

by Yuri-hime Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:46 pm

GoldenSun13 wrote:I'll just drop this here to lower the tone

LOL, nice! XD

*makes note to self to add this as my 'quote of the day' tomorrow, since I already added one quote for today already* :3

by **Lerena** Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:53 pm

I think the egg and the chicken came about at the same time. I doubt there's any supporting evidence to say that I'm correct though.

I have a question of my own:
If the Big Bang created the universe, what came before the Big Bang? There can be nothing, but what came before that nothing?

by Yuri-hime Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:07 pm

Lerena wrote:I think the egg and the chicken came about at the same time. I doubt there's any supporting evidence to say that I'm correct though.

I have a question of my own:
If the Big Bang created the universe, what came before the Big Bang? There can be nothing, but what came before that nothing?

There are actually quite a number of very intriguing answers and theories to this question, and Morgan Freeman does an *excellent* job with his series Through The Wormhole explaining these answers, so I'll let him take over here =D

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/through-the-wormhole-what-happened-before-the-beginning/

by **Luu Sky Sapphire** Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:26 pm

The illogical answer for Lerena's question would be: God.

Simple and not valid enough. ;p

by Yuri-hime Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:33 pm

Luu Sky Sapphire wrote:The illogical answer for Lerena's question would be: God.

Simple and not valid enough. ;p

Ah but the very point brought up by Morgan in the vid is, "if God did create all that we see here...who or what came before God" ;3

*makes plans to re-watch the ep myself later, as it's a pretty fun and interesting show to watch~*

by **Lerena** Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:48 pm

Luu Sky Sapphire wrote:The illogical answer for Lerena's question would be: God.

Simple and not valid enough. ;p

I believe that God exists, but here's the thing. Even if he created everything, I also believe in alternate dimensions, parallel universes, etc etc. I also believe there are multiple gods and goddesses.

In any case, God probably did create the Big Bang, evolution, and all scientific laws and theories that most religious people claim cannot coexist with their belief in their higher being. This question is something I have been pondering about for awhile. For some reason, I just find it illogical not to believe in God when it's impossible this is the only universe that exists. What is outside this universe? Another universe. What is beside this universe? Another universe. I cannot prove or disprove any of this, but I think mostly anything is possible.

As for what created God, that is always going to be controversial. There has to be something at the heart of all creation, but then there also has to be something that created that being. If you think of God as all that is and ever was, that makes more sense as long as you don't over-think things a bit. Problem is, I am a natural over-thinker.

by MidnightPersona Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:41 pm

My answer to both: Penguins. That's why. (Cuz I feel like I will debate to hard xD)

My question: What is normal?

by **ookamidesu** Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:51 pm

The chicken popped out of a rock and then proceeded to lay eggs for future generations...
*nod*nod*

by **Lerena** Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:52 pm

ookamidesu wrote:The chicken popped out of a rock and then proceeded to lay eggs for future generations...
*nod*nod*

I love that answer.

by **ookamidesu** Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:53 pm

Lerena wrote:
ookamidesu wrote:The chicken popped out of a rock and then proceeded to lay eggs for future generations...
*nod*nod*
I love that answer.

Lol. It seems most logical. *nod*nod*

by **Luu Sky Sapphire** Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:54 pm

MidnightPersona wrote:My question: What is normal?[/color]

It's not me, that's for sure. 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~! Excitedplz

by **Lerena** Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:05 pm

MidnightPersona wrote:My question: What is normal?

Normal? You mean the vocabulary word that my mind cannot comprehend?

by MidnightPersona Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:15 pm

Lerena wrote:
MidnightPersona wrote:My question: What is normal?
Normal? You mean the vocabulary word that my mind cannot comprehend?

nor·mal [nawr-muhl]
adjective
1.
conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; not abnormal; regular; natural.
2.
serving to establish a standard.
3.
Psychology .
a.
approximately average in any psychological trait, as intelligence, personality, or emotional adjustment.
b.
free from any mental disorder; sane.
4.
Biology, Medicine/Medical .
a.
free from any infection or other form of disease or malformation, or from experimental therapy or manipulation.
b.
of natural occurrence.
5.
Mathematics .
a.
being at right angles, as a line; perpendicular.
b.
of the nature of or pertaining to a mathematical normal.
c.
(of an orthogonal system of real functions) defined so that the integral of the square of the absolute value of any function is 1.
d.
(of a topological space) having the property that corresponding to every pair of disjoint closed sets are two disjoint open sets, each containing one of the closed sets.
e.
(of a subgroup) having the property that the same set of elements results when all the elements of the subgroup are operated on consistently on the left and consistently on the right by any element of the group; invariant.

by **Luu Sky Sapphire** Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:18 am

I got one for you smart-asses.

How does one turn up missing? If you turn up, you were never missing to begin with. :scratch:

by **Lerena** Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:24 am

Luu Sky Sapphire wrote:I got one for you smart-asses.

How does one turn up missing? If you turn up, you were never missing to begin with. :scratch:

Hm, strange. I can't answer that one and I'm well-versed in the art of being a smartass.

by **Luu Sky Sapphire** Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:26 am

Luu - 1

Overthinker - 0

Shizuru Fujino

Winning. Seriously, what the fuck...can anyone answer this?! Even in a sarcastic Gilmore Girls way?! @_@

by Kino karutta-chan Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:30 am

We had a similiar topic before, so I was so free and merged them together~

by **Luu Sky Sapphire** Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:46 am

Kino karutta-chan wrote:We had a similiar topic before, so I was so free and merged them together~

:) Thanks, Kino. Although I like the more recent posts better. :)

by **ookamidesu** Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:25 pm

Luu Sky Sapphire wrote:I got one for you smart-asses.

How does one turn up missing? If you turn up, you were never missing to begin with. :scratch:

One turns up elsewhere in a destination in which the speaker of said quote is unaware of. So, they turn up... but they are missing. Because the speaker of the quote does not know where one is gone.

It's the equivalent of lose, you see. Just because YOU lose your eraser, doesn't mean that the eraser is lost. The eraser knows perfectly well where is it (if it has consciousness). But because *you* don't know where it is, it is therefore classified as "lost".

But back to the point. Turning up does not necessarily mean that the person has gone to a place where the speaker knows of... or is at. Turning up can simply just be "having gone". So if one has gone missing, then they are missing.

:3

Is that smart-ass enough of an answer?

by **depression76** Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:28 pm

ookamidesu wrote:
Luu Sky Sapphire wrote:I got one for you smart-asses.

How does one turn up missing? If you turn up, you were never missing to begin with. :scratch:

One turns up elsewhere in a destination in which the speaker of said quote is unaware of. So, they turn up... but they are missing. Because the speaker of the quote does not know where one is gone.

It's the equivalent of lose, you see. Just because YOU lose your eraser, doesn't mean that the eraser is lost. The eraser knows perfectly well where is it (if it has consciousness). But because *you* don't know where it is, it is therefore classified as "lost".

But back to the point. Turning up does not necessarily mean that the person has gone to a place where the speaker knows of... or is at. Turning up can simply just be "having gone". So if one has gone missing, then they are missing.

:3

Is that smart-ass enough of an answer?

My god, you just broke my brain :(
but yea you have a point xDD

by **Lerena** Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:31 pm

ookamidesu wrote:
Luu Sky Sapphire wrote:I got one for you smart-asses.

How does one turn up missing? If you turn up, you were never missing to begin with. :scratch:

One turns up elsewhere in a destination in which the speaker of said quote is unaware of. So, they turn up... but they are missing. Because the speaker of the quote does not know where one is gone.

It's the equivalent of lose, you see. Just because YOU lose your eraser, doesn't mean that the eraser is lost. The eraser knows perfectly well where is it (if it has consciousness). But because *you* don't know where it is, it is therefore classified as "lost".

But back to the point. Turning up does not necessarily mean that the person has gone to a place where the speaker knows of... or is at. Turning up can simply just be "having gone". So if one has gone missing, then they are missing.

:3

Is that smart-ass enough of an answer?

Surprisingly I understand that answer perfectly; I have to read it slowly though or I get confused.

by **ookamidesu** Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:41 pm

depression76 wrote:
My god, you just broke my brain :(
but yea you have a point xDD

I'm told I'm good at that. :3

Lerena wrote:
Surprisingly I understand that answer perfectly; I have to read it slowly though or I get confused.

*nod*nod*
It's a play on perspective... and little bit on word itself. :D

by Sponsored content

'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!

Re: 'Cause Everyone Haz Questions~!